Today we have cybercafes and cyberwars but cybernetics the word that launched a dozen prefixes has been lost. In a new book, Thomas Rid aims to reconnect cyber to its original notion of man-machine symbiosis
Where did the cyber in cyberspace come from? Most people, when asked, will probably credit William Gibson, who famously introduced the word in his celebrated 1984 fiction, Neuromancer . It came to him while watching some children play early video games. Searching for a name for the virtual space in which they seemed immersed, he wrote cyberspace in his notepad. As I gazed at it in red Sharpie on a yellow legal pad, he later recalled, my whole delight was that it entailed absolutely nothing.
How wrong can you be? Cyberspace turned out to be the space that somehow morphed into the networked world we now inhabit, and which might ultimately prove our undoing by making us entirely dependent on a system that is both unfathomably complex and basically insecure. But the cyber- prefix actually goes back a long way before Gibson to the late 1940 s and Norbert Wieners book, Cybernetics, Or Control and Communication in the Animal and the Machine , which was published in 1948.
Cybernetics was the word Wiener, an MIT mathematician and polymath, coined for the scientific study of feedback control and communication in animals and machines. As a transdiscipline that cuts across traditional fields such as physics, chemistry and biology, cybernetics had a brief and largely unsuccessful existence: fewof the worlds universities now have departments of cybernetics. But as Thomas Rids absorbing new book, The Rise of the Machines: The Lost History of Cybernetics indicates, it has had a long afterglow as information sources of mythic inspiration that suffers to the present day.
This is because at the heart of the cybernetic notion is the proposition that the gap between animals( especially humen) and machines is much narrower than humanists believe. Its debate is that if you ignore the physical processes that go on in the animal and the machine and focus only on the information loops that govern these processes in both, you begin to see startling similarities. The feedback loops that enable our bodies to preserve an internal temperature of 37 C, for example, are analogous to the way in which the cruise control in our vehicles operates.
Dr Rid is a reader in the war examines department of Kings College London, which means that he is primarily interested in conflict, and as the world has gone online he has naturally been depicted into the study of how conflict manifests itself in the virtual world. When states are involved in this, we tend to call it cyberwarfare, a word of which I suspect Rid disapproves on the grounds that warfare is intrinsically kinetic( like Assads barrel bombs) whereas whats going on in cyberspace is much more sinister, elusive and intractable.
In order to explain how weve got so far out of our depth, Rid has effectively had to compose an alternative history of calculating. And whereas most such histories begin with Alan Turing and Claude Shannon and John von Neumann, Rid starts with Wiener and wartime research into gunnery control. For him, the modern world of technology begins not with the early digital computers developed at Bletchley Park, Harvard, Princeton and the University of Pennsylvania but with the interactive cannon systems developed for the US armed forces by the Sperry gyroscope company in the early 1940 s.
From this unexpected beginning, Rid weaves an interesting and original narrative. The seed crystal from which it grows is the idea that the Sperry gun-control system was essentially a way of augmenting the human gunners capabilities to cope with the task of hitting fast-moving targets. And it turns out that this dream of technology as a way of augmenting human capabilities is a persistent but often overlooked topic in the evolution of computing.
Read more: www.theguardian.com