Home Blog

Logz.io creates $16 million so folks can better understand and monitor their networks

It may not be the most compelling technology for customers, but for businesses, its important to know whats going on in a network.

Thats why Logz.io has managed to raise $16 million in a new round of financing from investors led by OpenView Venture Partners with participation from the companys previous investors 83 North and Giza Venture Capital.

As a result of the investment, OpenViews Jim Baum, a venture partner with the firm will take a seat on the Logz.io board of directors.

The former chief executive of Netezza and current chairman of Dyn ( which was recently in the new for network issues ), Baum said that OpenViews investment was, in part, a function of the traction that Logz.io has in the market. The company services approximately 1,000 companies from 80 different countries and has increased to prominence in just two years.

Logz.io couldnt have prevented the outage that shut down Dyn and crippled the Internet last month, but it did enable the company to bounce back quickly.

Dyn relies on Logz.io service in our global network operations team every day, said Baum in a statement. Being actively involved with Dyn, I assured first had how instrumental Logz.io was in our ability to quickly respond to and mitigate the recent unprecedented DDoS assaults we experienced, helping us assess the source, target, and protocols used.

Since its launch in 2014, Logz.io created$ 8 million in financial assistance for venture capital firms and developed and launched an artificial intelligence service.

Combining machine learning with human insights, the company has been unable to automate processes in developer and infrastructure operations so that coders and systems administrators can work together more effectively on product development.

Read more:

Haunting Gas Chamber Replica Remembers the Holocausts Horrors

The Evidence Room

Don’t turn away: A team of architectural historians rebuilt a Nazi gaschamber.

The stark-white plaster cast of work–on display at the Venice Architectural Biennale as” The Evidence Room “– does more than just stimulate guests uncomfortable( though it does that, too ). In responding to the Biennale’s theme,” Reporting from the Front ,” the reconstruction both recollects the Holocaust and refuses to let its literal designers escape without blame.

The exhibit actually grew out of a court case. In 1996, Holocaust denier David Irving sued novelist and historianDeborah Lipstadt and her publisher Penguin Books for libel. Lipstadt’s 1994 book Denying the Holocaust: The Growing Assault on Truth and Memory featured Irvings revisionist interpretation ofthe era. In order to fighting Irving’s lawsuit, Lipstadt had to prove that the Holocaust did, indeed, happen. The tribunal called on Robert Jan van Pelt, architectural historian at the University of Waterloo. His job, on the stand, was to prove the genocidal intent of concentration camp. He had the proof: the architects who construct the crematoriums left with blueprints and letters.

Interior view of the gas chamber doorway( foreground) and gas column( background) in The Evidence RoomThe Evidence Room

Van Pelt, along with other professors and students from the University of Waterloo, utilized that proof to reconstructfull-scale replicasof a gas column, a gas doorway, and a gas-tight hatch. They’re nightmarish to look at–but appearing, and acknowledging, isthe whole point. It’s a perfect instance of the unflinching tone Alejandro Aravena, the most recent win of architecture’s prestigious Pritzker Prizeand the director of this years Biennale, is urgingarchitects to adopt in facing difficult issues.

” It is a profound experience for all of us ,” said van Pelt in a statement,” and, in design terms, a revolutionary, unprecedented investigation into the possibility to represent something unrepresentable: the architectural evidence of a factory of death.

Read more:

Machine Learning the Product – Boxun Zhang

With Spotify’s constant evolving product and fast growing user base, the user behavior in Spotify is becoming significantly diversified and complex. Thus …

Read more: www.youtube.com

Live Love Books Love Series eruue` ng Secret& Summer ephl` aicchaihraketh` EP. 1

kamkabchiiriis aichynrngkh aetmphngs ekhiiynbth buyphngs phaanich, n `. nath, nisaachl pras…

Read more: www.youtube.com

Would you be interested in a deep learn MOOC focused on theory and turning research papers into real, working code?

Edit: Thanks for all the interest! If you want to get an email link to the course when it’s ready, please sign up on this Google Form: https :// docs.google.com/ sorts/ d/ e/ 1FAIpQLScFol5PqDV4y3Z0-pAqP5OoxXbH5BS2OSTpdMdSnqdWSrAG0g/ viewform. Thanks! No spam I promise. Just the best content I can possibly render to help you learn 🙂

Feedback I’ve gotten from Reddit so far:* Build the math intuitive and fun. Don’t gloss over it.* Introduce topics like Deep Reinforcement Learning. This is something I likely won’t do in the course because my focus is on depth , not breadth. I feel like if students complete my course, they’ll be prepared to read research papers to tackle deep reinforcement learning on their own and create working projects. I want to focus on attaining students strong fundamental practitioners of visual recognition with convolutional neural networks.

Hi Redditors! First off, I love this community where we share great resources to learn deep learn. I’ve been doing deep learning for 2 years now, and I work on an AI team that uses the latest deep learning research. Acquiring this knowledge and experience involved going down lots of rabbit holes, and after talking to my colleagues, I realized this is a common problem that many deep learning fanatics face. I’m thinking of creating a deep learn MOOC on one of the online learn platforms( e.g ., Udemy, Teachable, etc .), and I wanted to get feedback on whether or not technologists, data scientists, product administrators, and people generally interested in AI would want a course with the curriculum below. While there are plenty of great deep learn MOOCs on Coursera, Udacity, university websites, and others, I find that most, if not all, of them either focus heavily on theory without a lot of guidance on practical coding or focus heavily on coding without a lot of theory. Thus, upon completion of the course, students are either clueless as to how to translate the latest deep learn research into real code or have simply learned how to call a bunch of functions in Tensorflow without a true understanding of how to develop a good deep learn model.

In essence, I want to build the MOOC that I would have wanted to obtain a fundamental grasp of knowledge and experience equivalent to those obtained by masters students at CMU, Stanford, and Berkeley were they to take a course in visual recognition with deep learning. Another differentiating factor is I’ve already been teaching those around me about deep learning, and I often get feedback that I induce apparently complex theories appear simple and intuitive. I want to do this on a wider scale so that everyone can get into deep learn without the false notion that you can create something cool merely after completing a masters or PhD in artificial intelligence. Generating a really good course will take hundreds of hours, so I want to make sure there’s demand for this before I seek it. What do you think?

Note: The curriculum below is a rough draft.

The Essence of Computer Vision What is computer vision? Introduction to pixels 2D Images as 2D Math Functions Color Spaces Image Filters

Lab: Create your own Photoshop-like image filters( Gaussian blur, sharpening

Neural Networks

Linear Regression

Logistic Regression

SVM, Softmax, and Information Theory

Gradient Descent

Deep Neural Networks

Backpropagation

Universal approximation theorem

Regularization with L2 regularization and Dropout

Lab: Enforce an image compressing algorithm with a deep neural network

Convolutional Neural Networks

Convolutional Layers

Pooling Layers

Lab: Implement LeNet with Tensorflow and run on MNIST

Visualizing convolutional layers

Lab: Implement AlexNet with Tensorflow and run on CIFAR1 0

Batch Normalization

Lab: Feature extraction with VGGNet, ResNets

Object Detection and Image Segmentation

Lab: Work through paper on R-CNN and implement it in Tensorflow

Lab: Run through paper on Fast R-CNN and implement it in Tensorflow

Lab: Run through newspaper on Faster R-CNN and implement it in Tensorflow

Lab: Work through newspaper on Mask R-CNN and implement it in Tensorflow

New system allows near-zero-power sensors to communicate data over long distances

This low-cost, flexible epidermal medical-data patch prototype successfully transmitted information at up to 37500 bits per second across a 3,300-square-feet atrium. (credit: Dennis Wise/University of Washington)

University of Washington (UW) researchers have developed a low-cost, long-range data-communication system that could make it possible for medical sensors or billions of low-cost “internet of things” objects to connect via radio signals at long distances (up to 2.8 kilometers) and with 1000 times lower required power (9.25 microwatts in an experiment) compared to existing technologies.

“People have been talking about embedding connectivity into everyday objects … for years, but the problem is the cost and power consumption to achieve this,” said Vamsi Talla, chief technology officer of Jeeva Wireless, which plans to market the system within six months. “This is the first wireless system that can inject connectivity into any device with very minimal cost.”

The new system uses “backscatter,” which uses energy from ambient transmissions (from WiFi, for example) to power a passive sensor that encodes and scatter-reflects the signal. (This article explains how ambient backscatter, developed by UW, works.) Backscatter systems, used with RFID chips, are very low cost, but are limited in distance.

So the researchers combined backscatter with a “chirp spread spectrum” technique, used in LoRa (long-range) wireless data-communication systems.

This tiny off-the-shelf spread-spectrum receiver enables extremely-low-power cheap sensors to communicate over long distances. (credit: Dennis Wise/University of Washington)

This new system has three components: a power source (which can be WiFi or other ambient transmission sources, or cheap flexible printed batteries, with an expected bulk cost of 10 to 20 cents each) for a radio signal; cheap sensors (less than 10 cents at scale) that modulate (encode) information (contained in scattered reflections of the signal), and an inexpensive, off-the-shelf spread-spectrum receiver, located as far away as 2.8 kilometers, that decodes the sensor information.

Applications could include, for example, medical monitoring devices that wirelessly transmit information about a heart patient’s condition to doctors; sensor arrays that monitor pollution, noise, or traffic in “smart” cities; and farmers looking to measure soil temperature or moisture, who could affordably blanket an entire field to determine how to efficiently plant seeds or water.

The research team built a contact lens prototype and a flexible epidermal patch that attaches to human skin, which successfully used long-range backscatter to transmit information across a 3300-square-foot building.

The research, which was partially funded by the National Science Foundation, is detailed in an open-access paper presented Sept. 13, 2017 at UbiComp 2017. More information: longrange@cs.washington.edu.

UW (University of Washington) | UW team shatters long-range communication barrier for devices that consume almost no power


Abstract of LoRa Backscatter: Enabling The Vision of Ubiquitous Connectivity

The vision of embedding connectivity into billions of everyday objects runs into the reality of existing communication technologies — there is no existing wireless technology that can provide reliable and long-range communication at tens of microwatts of power as well as cost less than a dime. While backscatter is low-power and low-cost, it is known to be limited to short ranges. This paper overturns this conventional wisdom about backscatter and presents the first wide-area backscatter system. Our design can successfully backscatter from any location between an RF source and receiver, separated by 475 m, while being compatible with commodity LoRa hardware. Further, when our backscatter device is co-located with the RF source, the receiver can be as far as 2.8 km away. We deploy our system in a 4,800 ft2 (446 m2) house spread across three floors, a 13,024 ft2 (1210 m2) office area covering 41 rooms, as well as a one-acre (4046 m2) vegetable farm and show that we can achieve reliable coverage, using only a single RF source and receiver. We also build a contact lens prototype as well as a flexible epidermal patch device attached to the human skin. We show that these devices can reliably backscatter data across a 3,328 ft2 (309 m2) room. Finally, we present a design sketch of a LoRa backscatter IC that shows that it costs less than a dime at scale and consumes only 9.25 &mgr;W of power, which is more than 1000x lower power than LoRa radio chipsets.

Read more: www.kurzweilai.net

The 5 Best Email Apps That Use Machine Learning, AI

Email is a necessary evil, but there are ways to build the experience less painful. Today, there are numerous optionsthatcan automate some of themost annoying email-based chores for you. Use smart email appsones imbued with AI, a chatbot, orclever built-in triage toolsyou can get closer to inbox zero, be reminded of queriesfrom your boss, orhave scheduling handled for you.

Here are five alternatives to your phone’s built-in email app. They’ll save you hour, stressand maybe even money in the long run.

The 5 best email apps

1) Astro

Screengrab via Astro

Astrois a new email client that lately launched cross-platform on Android, iOS, and Mac. The app, which works withOffice 365 and Gmail accounts, divides your email into two groups: Priority and Other. From there, it lets youusegestures( long or short swipes to the right or left) to snooze, favorite, archive, or move an item in your inbox. The app also lets you set reminders so you can return to an important but ill-timed message whenit’s more convenient.

Astro’shallmark, though, is Astrobot, an AI chatbot. You can chat with Astrobot to automatically clean up your inbox, find important email attachments, or learn aboutemails that may require your attention. Most notably, however, Astrobot is designed to learn from your habits so it can then make recommendations to help you out. For instance, if you always wait to respond to emails from your brother in the evening, Astrobot will offer the option toautomatically snooze his messages until after work.On mobile, Astrobot lives ina separate tab from the rest of your inbox, so if you’d rather not get help from the app’s AI, you don’t have to. However, you’d be missing out on the app’s biggest strength if you didn’t check infrom is high time to time.

2) Zero

With an AI assistant, several interfaces you can choose from, and a host of other tools, the iOS appZero could build email overload a thing of the past. Like Astro, it divides your email into Primary and Other categories. From there, Zero offers three different inbox positions: the traditional “List” view, ” Triage ” opinion( which organizes your emails as Tinder-style swipeable cards ), and “Senders” opinion( which groupsemails by contact ). Its AI, which pops up as needed to highlight keyemails, also lets you choose different ways to organize your inbox, such as by important( as determined by your past email history ). And to induce replying to emails less time-consuming, Zero includesbuilt-in templates, which you can customize.

On top of that, Zero prides itself on being more secure than other email clients. It doesn’t store any of your emails or personal data in the cloudmessages remain locally on your telephone, or with your email provider. If you’re looking for a smarter, more secure email app, you may want to give Zero a shot.

3) Clara Labs

Screengrab via Clara Labs

Calendar always a clusterf* ck? Clara Labs is aremote assistantthat handles appointment scheduling and follow-ups so you don’t have to. Unlike other options here, Clara isn’t a separate email client in itself. To use it, you CC Clara on an email, and then she takes the email calendar coordination from there. If you didn’t know she was an AI, you’d guess she was a normal human assistant. The Clara AI is timely, responding to scheduling matters within an hour. She also does a great job of understanding context and conversational nuance.

Clara isn’t designed so much for personal employ, but rather for contractors and industries. After a two-week free trial, it costs $99/ month for scheduling up to 20 sessions per month, or $199/ month for a professional account, which includes up to 60 sessions. For those whohate time-consumingback-and-forths trying to coordinate meetingswith clients, Clara could be a sanity-saving business expense.

READ MORE 😛 TAGEND Everything we know about iPhone 8 19 iPhone apps no one should live without How to get faster Wi-Fi

Al Franken: ‘I don’t think that this president is equipped to handle the job’

The former comedian played it straight during his run for Senate. With a new volume, he has returned to his roots but there are certain jokes I dont tell

” I may body-slam you .”

Senator Al Franken is joking. Spotting a Guardian reporter, he supposes of the former Republican congressional nominee Greg Gianforte’s body slam of the Guardian’s Ben Jacobs, and cannot defy the quip. Having surgically removed his funny bone and gone serious, Franken is letting himself to be funny again.

On a recent visit to South St Paul Farmers’ Market in his home country of Minnesota, the comedian-turned-politician athletics a purple Vikings NFL hat and starts by buying green beans for$ 3 and zucchini for$ 2, digging into his wallet to pay 27 -year-old Ming Yang. As he moves to the next vegetable stalling, she acknowledges she is unaware of his previous career.” I only know what he’s done as a politician ,” she says.

Also among the rain-soaked assemble is Lisa Kleven, 51, wearing a” Franken 2020″ T-shirt she had stimulated that morning. Yes, she explains, she would like him to run for chairperson:” I’m so fed up listening to bad, ugly politics from Donald Trump and I think Al has been doing a good job holding people to account in the Senate. There was talk of people worrying that he was a comedian, but he’s a good guy with honesty and integrity .”

In many ways, Franken exemplifies the spirit of a time in which slapstick is political and politics are comical. He got his break as a novelist and musician on Saturday Night Live( SNL) in 1975 when Gerald Ford was president. He left in 1980, then had a second spell from 1985 to 1995, and was twice a guest performer at the White House correspondents’ dinner . SNL’s lampooning of legislators such as George W Bush and Sarah Palin have all along struck a nerve, but it had really become part of “the member states national” dialogue in the present epoch, for example with Alec Baldwin’s pastiche of Trump and Melissa McCarthy’s Sean Spicer.

When Franken, talk radio host and writer of Rush Limbaugh Is a Big Fat Idiot and Other Observations and Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them: A Fair and Balanced Look at the Right, ran for US Senate in 2008, Republican unavoidably stripped his jokes of context and tried to weaponise them. But Franken proved his run was no stunt.

Larry Jacobs, director of the Center for the Study of Politics and Governance at the University of Minnesota, recalls:” He was really smart. He truly got to know the state, he presented up, he constructed a real campaign organisation. He indicated he was committed and willing to learn and follow direction. He became a really infuriating guy. Let’s say I interview a thousand politicians in a year: he was easily the most boring .”

Boring worked. The Democrat won by 312 elections after a legal battle that dragged on for eight months.

Hillary
Hillary Clinton speaks with Al Franken at Democratic National Convention in Boston on 29 July 2004. Photograph: Gary Hershorn/ Reuters

And boring continued. As he chronicles in his book Giant of the Senate, described by the Washington Post’s James Hohmann as” the most candid memoir I can recall by a sitting senator “, Franken reckoned he had to prove himself as” a workhorse and not a prove horse “. He seldom spoke to reporters. He recollects committee hearings where his “devil” was sitting on shoulder, exhorting him to tell a risque gag, and his “angel” was on the other, pleading with him not to. The angel usually won.

But re-elected with room to spare in 2014, Franken has felt able to cut loose somewhat and juggle the roles of well briefed straight man – his sharp topics have rattled Betsy DeVos and Jeff Sessions– with a cautious return to tribunal jester.

The senator who tours the farmers’ market, then sits at the Black Sheep Coffee Cafe for an interview, is affable, down to earth and bursts out giggling as readily as breathing. He has evidently left what he calls the DeHumorizer- an imaginary $15 m machine built with Israeli technology- behind in Washington.

Well, virtually.” There are certain gags that I don’t tell ,” he says.” There always will be. The culture of slapstick is there’s just a category of jokes, what is the worst thing you can say? That is literally like a large segment[ giggles] of slapstick from comedians and that should not be in your quivering as a senator.’ I’m now going to say the worst thing I can say .'”

Some of the most trenchant skewering of Trump has come from SNL and the satirists Stephen Colbert, John Oliver, Samantha Bee and Trevor Noah. Some critics have blamed them for deepening divisions: the Atlantic suggested that” sneering hosts have alienated conservatives and attained liberals smug”, while the New York Times columnist Ross Douthat wrote that Bee exemplified” the rapid colonization of new cultural province by an ascendant social liberalism “.

Franken recollects of his SNL days:” When I was writing the irony on the depict, we really didn’t think that we had a political point of view to project. It’s almost impossible with Trump not to do,’ This guy is something that we’ve never seen before .’ He’s a guy who will lie, a guy who is completely undisciplined, a guy who won’t know anything, who doesn’t have the discipline or interest to learn public policy. I think laughter is good. There’s tremendous nervousnes among people who are like-minded .”

He recently induced the haunting observation that he has never seen Trump laugh and rejects the suggestion that the president- host of The Apprentice, fleeting wrestler , carnival barker- and himself are two sides of the same showbiz coin.” I understand there’s a thread of that but I couldn’t think of someone as more different than me and also kind of, a little bit, resent the idea that he’s an entertainer because yeah, reality television is a form of amusement, but so is a human cannonball. Rodeo clown is in amusement. A Barbra Streisand impersonator is in entertainment .”

Al
Al Franken and comedian Sarah Silverman speak during the first day of the Democratic National Convention in Philadelphia on 25 July 2016. Photograph: J Scott Applewhite/ AP

‘To pull yourself up by the bootstraps, you’ve got to have the boots’

Franken indicates in his book why slapstick alone was not enough and why he felt compelled to fight for the Democratic party. Like the film-makers Joel and Ethan Coen, the journalist and author Thomas Friedman and the political intellectual Norm Ornstein, he grew up in the Jewish community in St Louis Park, a suburb of Minneapolis , Minnesota. His generation enjoyed the postwar expansion of the middle class, strong colleges and a chance to go to university:” I felt like I could do anything .”

For his wife, it was harder. Her father, a second world war veteran, died in a car accident when she was 18 months old. Her mom was 29 and widowed with five children. They lived off social security but all four girls in the family went into higher education with the assistance of grants and scholarships. Franken’s brother-in-law joined the coast guard.

Just then, a patron of the cafe interrupts:” I merely want to say thank you, Mr Franken. God bless you .” The senator takes the compliment politely and carries on.

” They say you pull yourself up by your bootstraps. All Americans believe that. First, you’ve got to have the boot. My wife’s family got the boots and they all became productive middle-class people who plainly did better than where they started. That’s why I’m a Democrat .”

But did this message get lost in the recent elections?” Oh yeah, it definitely got lost, and I think that we got to get back to that ,” says Franken, who supported Hillary Clinton but at this moment sounds more like Bernie Sanders.” Many of the Trump voters, I think, are doing OK, but they see a lot of people not doing OK. They feel like the system is rigged and I agree with them, the system is rigged. I think we have different interpretations of how it’s rigged, but they’re angry at upper-class, and elites include Democrats and Republicans.

” I think there are a lot of people who merely feel there’s no difference between Democrats and Republicans: they’re all self-serving, and they responded to Trump saying we want someone who isn’t a legislator. The notion that he’s a billionaire, or by all appearances is a billionaire[ giggles]- I’m not quite sure what we’re going to find out at the end of this what his net worth is- but they liked the style that he clearly didn’t buy into what is considered conventional wisdom about what a legislator should be .”

The post-mortem is to reopen next month when Clinton publishes her account, What Happened. Franken believes that Russian meddling, including the hacking of Clinton campaign emails and the deliberate distribution of fake news in social media, certainly played a part, but there were” a lot of things that ultimately Hillary did wrong “.

He explains:” I thought they played defence, especially once the Access Hollywood stuff[ the infamous video in which Trump bragged about groping women] came out, which was:’ OK, this guy, it cannot happen, all we have to do is maintain saying how terrible he is, instead of saying this is our agenda .’ And I think that also there was a piece with her agenda which was very listy and white papery and not from the gut .”

Al
Al Franken on Capitol hill in Washington DC on 14 March 2017. Photograph: The Washington Post/ Getty Images

Clinton was also accused of playing” identity politics “ by espousing racial, religious and sexual minorities at the expense of the white working class in states such as Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, all of which she narrowly lost. Franken blames the right for trying to drive a wedge between progressives and so-called economic populists like Sanders.

” There is a tension there, because surely, working-class whites have been messaged by the right, I believe, to blame poor person for being poor and people of colour or the Democrats are just giving away stuff to buy their votes. Trump saying, like,’ What do you have to lose? Vote for me ,’ was more toward white people than it was, I suppose, toward black voters. It was basically saying,’ Democrats play the identity politics, they take them for granted, they don’t do anything for them other than cater and … erm, erm, you know …”

He breaks out of character again.” I’m looking for a word, I can’t find it. You’re a novelist, what’s a verb for, erm, catering to people and telling them what they want to hear ?”

The Guardian offers: “Pandering?”

” There you go ,” Franken says, erupting with mirth.” Thank you. I’m old. I’m 66. I worry about all this. I couldn’t find’ pander’ for like 30 seconds[ giggles loudly] and then I had to be told it. Very, very worrying[ chuckles ].

” Anyway, so of course there’s a division and that has been exploited by the right a lot by saying: OK, white working-class people who haven’t been getting ahead for 40 years who expected that their birthright as white middle-class working man was that your life would get better, in the same way that I believed you had to have a plan to fail, that you were entitled to your kids doing better than you did, and their kids, and for 40 years that didn’t happen, and that get you mad .”

Had it succeeded, Trump’s attempt to repeal and replace Barack Obama’s healthcare law would have caused even more pain to those very same people, experts said. Unlike some wary Democrats, Franken has long been unapologetic in his support for universal healthcare.

” I want it where everyone can get care: that’s what I think we should go for. In 2009, when we were putting together the Affordable Care Act( ACA ), I would have done the single-payer in a minute but we needed 60 elections and”- he deadpans-” “were gonna” 50 votes short. So that was a little problem, you know. Now we don’t have the presidency, so let’s build on the ACA … I guess Americans have come a long way and very often, I assured in polling, people would rather going to see single-payer .”

Franken
Franken advocate Lisa Kleven:’ There was talk of people worrying that he was a comedian, but he’s a good guy with honesty and integrity .’ Photo: David Smith for the Guardian

‘I believe the president should be someone who wants to be president’

Franken’s admirers include David Litt , result novelist on four of Barack Obama’s White House correspondents’ dinner presentations and writer of the memoir Thanks, Obama.” Al Franken is a very smart senator ,” he says by phone.” He understands the issues with a depth many of the other senators don’t have. The defining characteristic of Al Franken as a senator is he does his homework and the defining characteristic of Donald Trump is he doesn’t read anything beyond half a page .”

Litt adds:” Comedy is a tool in the toolbox in a way that it wasn’t before and if you are able to to be precise and funny and, candidly, go viral on the internet, that is an arrow in your shudder .”

So, mindful of the woman in the homemade” Franken 2020″ T-shirt, will Franken himself step up? Once again, he is straightforward.” No. It’s very flattering that people do that, very flattering that she had done it, but you know, I suppose the president should be someone who wants to be president[ giggles ]. As a senator, I’ve got a lot closer look at the presidency than I had as a comedian and it’s a really, genuinely high pressured chore, obviously.

” Mine’s kind of high pressured, too, but I think that the president, that’s a penalize, penalizing undertaking, and I’m glad there are people who’ve done it who I think were equipped to handle it. I don’t think that this president really is. Perhaps it’s not from absence of desire to want to be president. But to me, you want person there who can manage that unbelievable pressure day in day out and that’s not something I’ve wanted to do. This is enough .”

Is Franken bluffing? Jacobs, the University of Minnesota academic, supposes not.” It’s not going to happen. We’ve spent time together previously and he said,’ Perfectly not. I wouldn’t have written that volume if I was going to run for higher office. And I would be doing readings in Iowa and New Hampshire.’

” I agree with that. First, his track record is so explosive: he’s got gags about rape. I guarantee that would come back to life. Second, operating for president involves putting your life on hold for two or three years. It’s like a root canal. He doesn’t want to do that .”

In short, Franken is liberated from both his past and his potential future , not having to weigh every word and court every potential donor. He will continue to watch the White House’s theatre of the absurd as it outstrips even the most fevered comic imagination. To take merely one example, there was the day that then-White House press secretary Sean Spicer transgressed Godwin’s statute by comparing Syrian despot Bashar al-Assad with Adolf Hitler, whom he claimed had not use chemical weapons against his own people.

Franken, who is Jewish, was amused, rather than offended.” The phase at which he realised he’d done this was a very funny point. My goodness, and he merely went like,’ Oh my God! Oh my God! Oh my God! Oh Lord! Oh, my God! I just said that Assad’s worse than Hitler because Hitler didn’t use poison gas. Oh Lord! Oh .’ And then that’s how you get the’ Holocaust centres'[ laughs ], because I know what the hell is. I couldn’t find’ pander ‘!'[ giggles] I couldn’t find’ pander ‘.”

Read more: www.theguardian.com